Seven Hundred and Seventy Seven ~ 777

January 25, 2019 By BethSheba Ashe Leave a Comment

Seven Hundred and Seventy Seven

Welcome to my blog on gematria, the merkabah and the birth of the alphabet. I hope you enjoyed the holiday season. Although I promised I’d be back in the new year with an article about the Sefer Bahir and the Seven Palaces, that is taking rather longer to write than I had anticipated so I’ll bring that back at some time later this year. Today I’d just like to share some of my recent findings about the gematria of the seven palaces which are proving to be quite a lot of fun.

Add together ALL of the main gates of the wheel for all the letters of the paths (not the palaces) to find the sum is 3108 which is 777 * 4:

[217 x 3] + [206 x 4] + 9 + 11 + 11 + 25 + 45 + 88 + 209 + 211 + 231 + 254 + 265 + 274 = 3108 = 777 x 4.

In respect of the gates, I thought these examples were pleasing compositions:

Gate of Shin = 12
Gate of Tav = 13
Gate of Tsade = 99
Gate of Qoph = 109
12 + 13 + 99 + 109 = 233 (the gate of the Seventh Palace).

670 – 452 = 218
218 + 265 + 217 = 700.

The Seven Palaces colour coded to HaShem.

When the Seven Palaces is organized into three columns it also totals to 777;
From Beth around to Heh on the left side; 2 + 8 + 1 + 40 + 4 + 200 + 5 = 260
From Beth to Heh down the middle; 2 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 200 + 60 + 5 = 282
From Beth around to Heh on the right side; 2 + 6 + 1 + 20 + 4 + 4 + 3 + 90 + 100 + 5 = 235
260 + 282 + 235 = 777.

I’ve also been doing a little bit of work with the organization of the bible at the moment. According to the Masoretic text, there were 10 generations from Adam to Noah, inclusive. There were another 10 generations after Noah and to Abraham, inclusive. This may not be a coincidence, but a sign of organization. Perhaps, like the opening 2 chapters of Genesis, the rest of the text has been organized into an alphabetic acrostic of ancestors, but arranged to the 20 count? I’ve made some notes about the gematria of the names and although not all of them yielded to my examination, a few of them threw up some intriguing results. Speculatively then, using the same order as we find the first Genesis alphabetic acrostic;

Order. Generation, (# of name), letter of the alphabet, mnemonic, [my notes];

HaAdam, (50), Beth, The House of God [Note 50 + 2 Beth = 52 (weeks of the year).]
Seth, (7), Aleph, Day and Night [Note ~ 7 for the days of the week.]
Enos, (60), Gimel and Shin, The Sky and Fire – Heat – Warmth – Dry Land [Note ~ 60 x 3 gimel = 180. 60 x 3 shin = 180. 180 + 180 = 360 (degrees in a circle)…]
Cainan, (210), Daleth and Tav, The Doors into and out of the World, and Time [Note ~ 7 x 30. Also, 210 – 4 = 206; the gate of the first path which is where the tav is located (דשתצקה).]
Mahlaleel, (136), Heh, Stars and Starlight upon the World.
Jared, (214), Vav, Birds and Fish [Note ~ 214 + 6 = 220.]
Enoch, (84), Zayin, Cattle and Insects [Note ~ 84 / 7 = 12. 84 x 7 = 588. 588 / 12 = 49 = 7 x 7.]
Methuselah, (91), Cheth, Sight – Vision – The Image of God [Note ~ 91 x 8 = 728 (364 x 2).]
Lamech, (90), Teth, Food [Note ~ Teth is 9 so ‘Lamech’ is 10 x 9.]
Noah, (58), Yod, Rest and Contemplation
Shem, (43), Kaph, Mist – Rain and Desire [Note ~ 43 is half of אלהים ‘Elohim’ ]
Arphaxad, (308), Lamed, Spirit – Neshamah [Note ~ 248 + 60 = 308.]
Salah, (41), Mem, Pregnancy [Note ~ אם ‘Am’ means ‘mother’ with a value of 41.]
Eber, (272), Nun, Life and Death
Peleg, (113), Samekh, The Great River
Reu, (276), Ayin, Temptation
Serug, (212), Peh, Mating and sex [Note ~ 212 + 80 = 292 / 80 = 3.65, but also 212 / 80 = 2.65. Remove the decimal point in these results for 365 days in a year and 265; the gate of the samekh.]
Nahor, (264), Tsade, Childbirth [Note ~ 264 days is the length of an average pregnancy.]
Terah, (212), Qoph, The Moon – Woman – Eve [Note ~ the name of the Moon-god in North Syria was “Terah.”.]
Abram / Abraham, (243 / 248), Resh, The Sun – Man – Adam.

It begs the questions; if this alphabetic acrostic forms the basis of the generations of Adam, then does it follow suit for the descendants of Abraham too? And if so, does this mean the Seven Palaces was used by biblical authors as a sort of… ancient sacred Filofax? What do you think?

777 days a week

Welcome to my blog about gematria, the merkabah and the birth of the alephbet. This is a short addendum to yesterdays post.

ראשון שני שלישי רביעי חמישי שישי שבת = 777

Gematria # Hebrew English Transliteration

ראשון 260 Sunday Rishon

שני 63 Monday Sheni

שלישי 56 Tuesday Shlishi

רביעי 292 Wednesday Revi’i

חמישי 71 Thursday Chamishi

שישי 26 Friday Shishi

שבת 9 Saturday Shabbat

= 777

Gematria # Hebrew	English	Transliteration
ראשון 260	Sunday	Rishon
שני 63	Monday	Sheni
שלישי 56	Tuesday	Shlishi
רביעי 292	Wednesday	Revi’i
חמישי 71	Thursday	Chamishi
שישי 26	Friday	Shishi
שבת 9	Saturday	Shabbat

What are the odds that the days of the week would sum to 777? Pretty incredible, isn’t it? You can use my gematria calculator to check it out if you’d like; Shematria.

Which is more likely… that the days of the week sum to seven hundred and seventy seven by coincidence? Or that the seven words have been carefully pruned or developed to fit an ideal ‘perfect’ number to the glory of God? And whom might have arranged for such a thing? This poses a lot more questions than answers at the moment. Let me know what you think.

Stay tuned for more numerical honey…

[Reposted here from my blog with The Times of Israel; 777; episodes 12 & 13].

Hear O Israel the Lord Is Our God the Lord is one!

January 25, 2019 By BethSheba Ashe Leave a Comment

[First published on DEC 25, 2018, 6:25 AM;
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/hear-o-israel-the-lord-is-our-god-the-lord-is-one/].

Welcome to a special installment of my blog on gematria, the merkabah and the birth of the alephbet. Today I wish to share with you some truly amazing, beautiful and awe inspiring gematria work by Reuben Levi on the Shema! It brought tears to my eyes and I thank him for revealing it and allowing me to share it with you. ~ Bethsheba Ashe.

Reuben Levi ~
Using the Chariot gematria, I took a look at the Shema, which is known as the “watch-word” of the Jewish faith― whatever a “watch-word” is. Those of you who know a little about the format of a Jewish prayer service may know that the ḥazzan (cantor) calls out the Shema (Deuteronomy 6:4) as it is written:

שמע ישראל אדוני אלהינו אדוני אחד

(“Hear, O Israel, the Lᴏʀᴅ is our Goᴅ, the Lᴏʀᴅ is one!”)

The gematrical value of this verse using Chariot gematria is 614― ONE MORE than 613.

The following verse does not appear in the Scripture, and if person is praying alone or in a group of less than ten, it is uttered silently― but when a congregation of at least ten people is present, they respond to the leader’s recitation of the Shema by chanting the following phrase aloud:

ברוך שם כבוד מלכותו לעולם ועד
(“Bless His Majesty’s Name forever!”)*

The gematrical value of this phrase using Chariot gematria is 665― ONE LESS than 666.

At Beth’s suggestion, I decided to see what would happen if I substituted “King Solomon” (שלמה המלך) for “His Majesty’s Name” in the response:

ברוך שם שלמה המלך לעולם ועד
(“Bless the name of Solomon the King forever.”)

Lo and behold, the gematrical value sums to exactly 700!

Knowing that King Solomon was also known as Jedidiah (ידידיה), I tried substituting that name instead:

ברוך שם ידידיה המלך לעולם ועד
(“Bless the name of Jedediah the King forever.”)

Wouldn’t you know it, the gematrical value is 665― the same as the traditional response.

It’s worth mentioning that in Kabbalah, the opening verse of the Shema is associated with Heaven, because the word Eloheinu (“Our God”) dwells in it. The response line, then, is associated with the Earth. Traditionally, the Shema is recited when wrapping the tefillin (phylacteries) to the forehead and to the left arm (beside the heart). The significance of this ritual is to “bind” the head, heart and hand into ONE: a unified vehicle for carrying out God’s work on Earth.

In concordance with that precept, the response to the Shema is worded in a very particular way. If you’re familiar with Hebrew or the Jewish liturgy, then you may know that ברוך שם כבוד מלכותו לעולם ועד is typically translated as “Blessed be His glorious Kingdom forever” or “Blessed be the glory of His Kingdom forever.” For those who understand Hebrew grammar, this presents a bit of a problem, because the word kevod (“glory”) is a noun, and is interposed between shem (“name”) and malkhuto (“His Kingdom”).

*Without getting into the intricacies of Hebrew noun construct-chains, the phrase is syntactically odd in that שם כבוד מלכותו literally parses out as “[the] name [of the] glory [of] His Kingdom.” So the glory of His Kingdom has a name? Not exactly. There’s a nuance at play here. The word מלכות means “kingdom” but could also be rendered as “kingship” or even “majesty.” The fact is, כבוד מלכותו is meant to be read as a single unit: an honorific comparable to “His [Glorious] Majesty.” That’s why I translated it as above: “Bless His Majesty’s Name forever.” (That’s what cued Beth into the idea that “His Majesty’s Name” might in fact be the name of King Solomon a.k.a. Jedediah.)

To wrap it up (no pun intended) the Shema and its non-Scriptural response are symbolic of the channeling of Divine Energy from Heaven to Earth. As stated above, the Shema itself represents Heaven, while the response represents Earth. To be more precise, the first line represents the highest Heaven, known in Kabbalah as the World of Atzilut (“Emanation”). The response is like a ladder that steps down one word/world at a time and ends on the Earth. Let’s consider the phrase as literally parsed, “Bless the NAME of the GLORY of His KINGDOM.”

For this purpose, “NAME” represents the head (the phylactery between the eyes) and the World of Beriah (“Creation”), because the name is “created” as a thought (מחשבה) in the brain (מוח). Next, “GLORY” represents the heart (the phylactery on the left arm) and the World of Yetzirah (“Formation”), because glory― a synonym for תפארת (“Beauty”) is formed in the heart (לב). Finally, we end with “KINGDOM” which represents the hand (the strap winding down the arm to the finger) and the World of Assiyah (“Action”), because the good deeds (מעשים טובים) are performed with the hand (יד).

So by wrapping the tefillin and reciting the Shema and its response, we are performing a ritual symbolic of transmitting Heavenly power down to the Earth. At the start, I demonstrated that the gematrical value of the Shema is 614 and the value of its response is 665.The last word of the former is “one” and by transmitting a 1 (i.e. God) down from Heaven to Earth, we end up with 613 Mitzvot above, and 666 representing the Earth below.

In our solar system, any planet’s orbital period (i.e. the time it takes to complete one whole circle around the Sun, in years) is directly related to its average distance from the Sun. If P is the planet’s orbital period in years, and D is its average distance from the Sun in Astronomical Units (AU) then the equation to derive the later from the former is D = P·⁶⁶⁶. That is, D equals P to the power of 0.666. This is accurate to at least 99.9% for every planet from Mercury to Uranus, and accurate to 99.8% for Pluto. You can do the math to prove this.”

What a beautiful gift for the holidays! Note ~ the Palace of King Solomon in 1 Kings corresponds with the first Palace of the Seven, which becomes the Sephiroth of Yesod and Malkuth on the Tree of Life.

And that’s a wrap for today [also no pun intended!] Thank you for reading my blog and for all your support and encouragement. We truly appreciate it. Have a wonderful day. I’ll be back in the new year with my analysis of the Sefer Bahir, so stay tuned for more numerical honey!

~ Bethsheba Ashe.

Merkabah ~ the secret center of Kabbalah!

January 25, 2019 By BethSheba Ashe Leave a Comment

Welcome to my blog about biblical gematria, the merkabah and the birth of the alphabet. In my next posts we’ll discover why the Merkabah is the beating heart of Kabbalah and its secret center.

Corrections

Before we start today, I’d like to address an issue that came up after my last blog post (besides the layout issues with the calculations). I accidentally mislead by saying the Greek values had been transliterated. In actual fact I’d reasoned that if biblical Isopsephy followed the pattern of biblical gematria then two of the letters of the standard Greek set would be incorrectly numbered as 300 and 400. I determined that these were the Tau and Upsilon and I adjusted the values of those accordingly. Likewise I adjusted the Greek letters that matched the sofit values of the Hebrew to their normally valued counterparts. So I started with the standard values for the Greek and adjusted them to biblical gematria with these tweaks. My apologies; I’d temporarily forgotten how I came by them. I should really take more notes… Many thanks to David Allen Hulse for pointing out my error.

Kabbalah

The three most famous texts of Kabbalah are the Sefer Yetzirah, the Bahir and the Zohar and all of them are connected with either biblical gematria or with the conformations of the Seven Palaces [the Wheel of the Chariot]. The Yetzirah may have used biblical gematria with an ancient system of trigonometry, while the Bahir and the Zohar each contain midrash upon the Palaces. One book of the Zohar in particular (the Sefer Dtzeniouthia) contains a riddling instruction for converting the diagram of the Tree of Life into the Seven Palaces.

The Sefer Yetzirah
The most famous and arguably the most controversial of the texts of Kabbalah is the Sefer Yetzirah. There is debate over whether the text can even be classified as Kabbalistic due to the early date of its composition[1] and its gnostic influences. I’ve studied it, but to tell you the truth I’ve never gotten very much sense out of it, which is a reflection on me and not the text. Happily, my friend ‎ראובן הלוי has been doing rather better, and after analyzing the Sefer Yetzirah with biblical gematria (aka Chariot gematria) he believes that an ancient system of trigonometry may be embedded within the text. He’s used biblical gematria with the 231 Gates of the Sefer Yetzirah. I will quote him here in full:

The 231 gates of the Sepher Yetzirah.

“I created a modified circle of letters by combining ג/ד into one section and ש/ת into one section since ש/ג and ד/ת share the values of 3 and 4 respectively. So instead of a circle divided into 22 sections, it’s now divided into 20 sections with the line between א and ב centered at the top, and the ג/ד and ש/ת sections directly opposing each other from either side of א and ב.

Following the logic of the Chariot, each gate is a line connecting two letters on the circumference of the wheel. The value of each gate is computed by adding the values of the two connected letters. So gate בא/אב would have a value of 3, gate מח/חמ would have a value of 48, etc. (A gate and its reverse are counted as the same gate, e.g. אב and בא are the same gate; חמ and מח are the same gate, etc.― Otherwise there would be 462 gates instead of 231.)

The major change that occurs using the Chariot gematria is that instead of every letter having a unique value (1 to 400) now there are two letters with the value of 3 (ג and ש) and two letters with the value of 4 (ד and ת). With two duplicated values it becomes possible to form triangles with their vertices located at the circumference of the circle.

Because ג and ש both have the value of 3, the gate from שת to ח and the gate from גד to ח can both have the same value of either 11 or 12. (If we use שת as 3, we have to use גד as 4. If we use שת as 4, we have to use גד as 3. Because either option is possible, gates שת―ח and גד―ח can be either 3+8=11 or 4+8=12.) We could also take שת and גד as both equaling 7. In that case, שת―ח and גד―ח would both equal 15. In either case, we can proceed around the circle as I’ve done in the rest of the images [ed – follow this link to see all 18 individual images].

Note that if ש is 300 and ת is 400, gates with equal values will only form parallel lines that never intersect. For example פי ,עכ ,סל and נמ all have the value of 90, but all of those lines are parallel, because in a circle, 80~10 contains 70~20, 60~30 and 50~40― so they will not intersect. If we take two random gates that do intersect, like במ and טק, the intersection will be somewhere in the middle of the circle, not at the circumference. Only the Chariot gematria allows triangles to be formed whose vertices are on the circumference of the circle.

There are 18 possible triangles that can be formed (see third image). If using 3 & 4 as the “counter-values” of שת―גד, the triangles two other gates values can be 4/5, 5/6, 8/9, 9/10, 10/11, 11/12, 12/13, 13/14, 23/24, 33/34, 43/44, 53/54, 63/64, 73/74, 83/84, 93/94, 103/104 and 203/204. If we use 7 as the counter-value of שת―גד, the triangles two other gates can have the values of 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 27, 37, 47, 57, 67, 77, 87, 97, 107 and 207.

What I have to do now (and I would much appreciate the help of someone more adept at mathematics than myself) is figure out if these values correspond to a table of sines/cosines. If so, then the Sefer Yezirah― when decoded with the Chariot gematria― contains an ancient system of trigonometry.” ~ ראובן הלוי

Unfortunately I can be of very little use to him as my mathematical skill is rather basic, so if you can help him take his research forward please get in touch!

Next up we’ll be taking a look at the the Sefer Bahir so stay tuned for more numerical honey.

—

[1] Christopher P. Benton dated it to the time of the Mishna (2nd Century CE) due to its grammatical form, but Richard Reitzenstein placed its origin in the 2nd Century BCE.

How biblical gematria entered the Greek script

January 25, 2019 By BethSheba Ashe Leave a Comment

Welcome to the ninth installment of my blog about Gematria, the Merkabah and the birth of the Alephbet. Today I’ll be looking at how biblical gematria was adapted to the Greek script, and giving some examples from the New Testament.

There have been few writers who specialize on the subject of gematria, so it suffers from having too few references, with the consequence that insufficient research by these writers can be given too much weight. For instance, the writer Kieran Barry (1999) opined that gematria had Greek origins, which is completely untrue as I’ll demonstrate.

When Stephen J. Lieberman (1987) published his excellent paper ‘A Mesopotamian Background for the So-Called Aggadic ‘Measures’ of Biblical Hermeneutics?‘ he made it quite clear that Jewish gematria is as different from the Mesopotamian practice of “aru” as chalk is from cheese.

The chief problem that has hindered the research of most writers on gematria, was that the proper values of biblical gematria were popularly unknown and were not easily discoverable. Biblical gematria gives the value 3 to both the gimel and the shin, and gives the value of 4 to both daleth and tav, and this duplication of the value is counter-intuitive to what most people believe a number set should be, and can cause some cognitive dissonance. So I call Stephen Lieberman’s paper ‘excellent’ because he did the very best job he could do of analyzing the matter given that he, like many others, were using the wrong number set, and this explains why there are no convincing examples of gematria in the Torah using ‘standard’ values.

Likewise, when it comes to the Greek version of gematria; called Isopsephy, researchers have had exactly the same problem; to date they have been analyzing the texts of the New Testament using the wrong number set. The correct number set is a transliteration of biblical gematria:

Biblical gematria;
א 1 ב 2 ג 3 ש 3 ד 4 ת 4 ה 5 ו 6 ז 7 ח 8 ט 9 י 10 כ 20
ל 30 מ 40 נ 50 ס 60 ע 70 פ 80 צ 90 ק 100 ר 200

To arrive at these values, the Standard Isopsephy values are adjusted to match their Biblical Gematria counterparts, and so we use the extended version of Standard (which has the final forms of the letters extending into the hundreds) as a key. For example: because Standard Gematria (SG) has Shin as 300 but Biblical Gematria counts Shin with the value of 3, then Greek Tau is adjusted to 3 rather than 300; and because (SG) counts Peh sofit as 800, but in Biblical Gematria (BG) sofits have no different values to the normal letters so Greek Omega is counted as 80 rather than 800; and because Kaph sofit is 500 by (SG) but is 20 by (BG) then Phi, which has the Standard Isopsephy value of 500 is adjusted to hold the value of 20. Due to the fact that there is no natural relationship between the Greek letters Phi (20) and Kappa (20) as there is for Kaph and Kaph sofit which is the same letter with the only difference being the Kaph sofit appears at the end of a word, then it follows that Biblical Gematria was ported to the Greek script and not the other way on. Standard Isopsephy can be converted to Biblical Isopsephy by following how Biblical Gematria was changed to Standard Gematria, but Standard Gematria cannot be converted back to Biblical Gematria by simply comparing Standard Isopsephy with Biblical Isopsephy, and this conclusively proves the case that Biblical Isopsephy emerged from Biblical Gematria.

The amount of work I’ve done with the NT is rather limited in comparison to the amount of time and study I’ve devoted with the Torah, but I can say with some confidence that the conventions of this gematria are of a different flavor. For instance, there tends not to be the rigorous exclusion of small words and verbs from the calculations, and this may be because Greek words tend to return higher values than Hebrew ones, making it more difficult to construct calculations for smaller numbers without using the small words. On the other hand some authors, like Matthew, follow the convention of dropping a signal when they have some gematria to follow.

Let’s start with a verse that has puzzled biblical researchers for centuries; John 21:10-11:

‘Jesus told them, “Bring some of the fish you have just caught.” So Simon Peter went aboard and dragged the net to the land, full of large fish, one hundred fifty-three. And although there were so many, the net was not torn.”

ιχθυων + μεγαλων + δικτυον + γην + 153 = 777.
of fish + large + net + land + 153 (the number of fish) = 777.

For our next verse, let’s have a look at the gematria of the name “Jesus Christ”. In Greek it is Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ which yields an Isopsephy value of 719‎, and this is significant because every twelve hours the hour hand and seconds hands of an analog clock align exactly 719 times, and perhaps the drips from a water clock would also coincide at this rate? Possibly someone who is an expert in ancient time pieces could answer that. In John 11:9 it says this:

‎Jesus answered, “Are there not twelve hours of day? If ‎anyone walks in the day, he will not stumble, because ‎he sees by the light of this world.”‎

…and features the following calculations;

Twelve hours = δωδεκα ωραι = 305
Of the day = της ημερα = 365
365 – 305 = 60anyone walks in the day = τις περιπατη εν τη ημερα = 720
720 / 60 = 12 (hours)not = possibly suggests the reverse symmetry that follows;
stumbles = προσκοπτει = 638
light + world + he sees = φως κοσμου βλεπει = 836 [reverse symmetry of 638 ‘stumbles’]

anyone + light + world = τις φως κοσμου = 917 [reverse symmetry of 719 ‘Jesus Christ’]

For my third example, and since we’re only a week away from Christmas, I’m going to investigate the Isopsephy of the birth of Jesus, so we’ll pick up the Gospel of Matthew 2:1. Matthew helpfully follows the traditional conventions and signals where the gematria is by saying “behold!”

Τοῦ δὲ Ἰησοῦ γεννηθέντος ἐν Βηθλέεμ τῆς Ἰουδαίας ἐν ἡμέραις Ἡρῴδου τοῦ βασιλέως, ἰδοὺ μάγοι ἀπὸ ἀνατολῶν παρεγένοντο εἰς Ἱεροσόλυμα. λέγοντες Ποῦ ἐστιν ὁ τεχθεὶς βασιλεὺς τῶν Ἰουδαίων; εἴδομεν γὰρ αὐτοῦ τὸν ἀστέρα ἐν τῇ ἀνατολῇ καὶ ἤλθομεν προσκυνῆσαι αὐτῷ.

Word by word translation with gematria;
‘Then now [Jesus (292)], having been born in [Bethlehem (99)] the [of Judea (300)], in [the days (364)] [of Herod (266)] the [King (528)], behold, [Magi (124)] from the east arrived in [Jerusalem (530)], asking, “Where is [he who (70)] [has been born (272)] [King (452)] of the [Jews (229)]? We saw for [of him (82)] the [star (310)] in the east and [are come (212)] [to worship (743)] [him (88)].”

The phrase “in the east” may be a biblical convention similar to “on the head” or “by the foot”; meaning that only the first syllable of the adjacent word should be considered. If that’s true then “in the east” would be the right hand side and “in the west” would be the left hand side of the word, altering the value of those words to the calculation. And they are:

Magi = MA[GOI (83)] = μάγοι
Star = Aste[ra (101)] = αστερα

…which gives us;
530 Jerusalem + 83 Magi = 613
101 Star + 82 ‘of him’ = 183.

… and although the greater value of the name (1012) is not here, the value of the name Jesus is interesting in connection to Hashem because; 1012 – 292 = 720; which is 365 x 2 [all the days + all the nights in a year].

613 is generally associated with the number of mitzvot in the Torah, but it is also discovered during the first few verses of Genesis as I explained in a prior blog here;

[Genesis 1:2-3] פְּנֵ֣י תְה֑וֹם – וְחֹ֖שֶׁךְ + אֽוֹר : the face of the deep – and darkness + light = 365
[Genesis 1:4] הָא֖וֹר + הַחֹֽשֶׁךְ : the light + the darkness = 248
365 + 248 = 613.

183 is a value usually associated with a personification of Winter, or Winter King, who is usually the eldest brother of a King of Summer. We see the value pop up in Genesis 25:27 with; [Esau + Hunter (183)] + Jacob (182) = 365.

There’s quite a lot more to this verse but that’s all I’ve got time for today. It’s a nice bit of gematria to find during the seasons holidays, but that wasn’t the main point of this post which has been to show QED that Greek Isopsephy in the New Testament is based on the Hebrew gematria of the Torah. I hope you’ve enjoyed this special installment. I’ll be back to Hebrew and Torah study in my next blog, so thank you for all your support and shares, and stayed tuned for more numerical honey.

—————————————————-
Links
Shematria ~ Hebrew and Greek Biblical Gematria Calculator.

[First published DEC 19, 2018, 1:59 AM; https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/how-biblical-gematria-entered-the-greek-script/].

The gematria of the universal and the particular

January 25, 2019 By BethSheba Ashe Leave a Comment

Welcome to the eighth installment of my blog covering biblical gematria, the merkabah and the birth of the alephbet.

This morning, like a bee to honey, I have been contemplating a wonderful post made by Rabbi Sacks : ‘The universal and the particular (Miketz 5779)’. He said a lot of interesting things that are worthy of further exploration, and in this blog we’ll look at how they bear a reference to biblical gematria, so please preface your reading of this by first reading the piece by Rabbi Sacks.

The entertainer and occult comedian, Lon Milo Duquette once pointed out that the very first thing that people do when they find out about gematria is calculate the value of their own name. Usually to see whether it totals to 666 or not. It’s a great comedic observation. Ask people about this and they’ll grin at you wryly as they remember their first exercise with gematria. They feel a tad foolish. It’s a little bit embarrassing to be caught red handed in such a rank display of egotism but it’s terribly funny because it’s universally true for just about everyone. Well… maybe not the 666 part.

Why do we do it? Perhaps its as Ajahn Munindo once pointed out in a rather good dhamma talk; that we’re just terribly important to ourselves. We have this “me” that wants to me recognized as “me”, and so we find ourselves in front of a gematria calculator typing our name into the box and expecting a number back that will … what? Define this sense of “me”? When asked what they expected from the exercise, most people cannot tell you, only that they expected “something” back. That “something” is more than a number to them. It means “something”, and that “something”, like the soul itself, is both universal and particular.

Rabbi Sacks observed: “The difference between proper names and generic descriptions is fundamental. Things have descriptions, but only people have proper names. When we call someone by name we are engaged in a fundamental existential encounter. We are relating to them in their uniqueness and ours. We are opening up ourselves to them and inviting them to open themselves up to us. We are, in Kant’s famous distinction, regarding them as ends, not means, as centres of value in themselves, not potential tools to the satisfaction of our desires.”

Unless your view of the world is animistic this is true, but a name is more than a personal pronoun; a name – particularly one written in the hebrew script – is made universal by its number.

Rabbi Sacks continued: “Hence the tension in Judaism between the universal and the particular. God as we encounter Him in creation is universal. God as we hear Him in revelation is particular.”

I have a small disagreement with this because to my mind, revelation is both universal and particular. The universal influences the particular and from the particular arises the universal, and both conditions apply all at once. There are no hard and fast semantic barriers to separate the tripartite soul. A good metaphor is the ocean, which does not cease to be the ocean as the waves roll into the shore (universal to particular), nor does the tide water become more ocean as it flows away from the shore (particular to universal).

When we analyse the Torah with biblical gematria it becomes clear that the names of the main characters have been either crafted or chosen specifically because of their number. To give you some examples, when God (Elohim) changes the name of Abram to Abraham he gives his reason for it: המון גוים נתתיך ‘of many nations I have made you‘ (Genesis 17:5).

המון גוים נתתיך = 248
אברהם = 248

In Genesis 32:28 for the name of Israel (244) the reason given by Elohim is:

שָׂרִ֧יתָ You have struggled = 217
אֱלֹהִ֛ים God = 86
אֲנָשִׁ֖ים Men = 104
(217 – 86) + (217 – 104) = 244.

And in Genesis 17:15-16 for the name of Sarah (208) the reasons given by Elohim are:

Shall be her name 48 + of people 160 = 208.
213 Sarai + 31 Shall come = 244.
30 And she shall be + 89 of Nations + 100 Kings + 160 of people – 135 from her = 244.

[ Interestingly, the names of both הָגָ֖ר – ‘Hagar’ and יִצְחָ֑ק – ‘Isaac’ also total to 208. ]

What do these numbers have in common?

248 + 244 + 208 = 700, which we first saw in Genesis 1:1:
220 In the Beginning + 86 Elohim + 98 Heavens + 296 Earth = 700.

While the Peshat interpretation of these verses concerns itself with human affairs and particular human names, the Sod shoots out universals for consideration and Talmud tell us that these interpretations do not contradict. Surely that is a reminder that this separate and particular egocentricity or “me-ness” that we all feel, is yet rooted in the universality of God.

I hope you’ve enjoyed this installment of my blog. If you’d like to request a topic for the next post then please feel free to drop me a line by using the comment box below. Thank you and stayed tuned for more treats from the Torah’s dessert table.

Merkabah and the Gematria of the Holy Name of God

January 25, 2019 By BethSheba Ashe Leave a Comment

Welcome to the seventh installment of my blog about biblical gematria, the Merkabah and the birth of the Alephbet. Today I want to discuss the gematria of the Holy Name (HaShem) and why it was such a unifying monotheistic engine in ancient times, as well as asking “Where does the holy name come from?” And “What do the letters Yod Heh Vav Heh actually stand for?”

[As usual I’m using biblical gematria values which may be different from what you are used to. Please see my first blog post if you haven’t used biblical gematria before.]

By using the letters of the name as an acronym, the wheel can be divided into 4 sections;

Yod for the inner paths
Heh for the sanctuary
Vav for the paths of the circumference
Heh for the remaining palaces.

This gives us a grand total of 1,012 for all the letters. When all the numbers of the middle column (282 without ‎using gates) are removed from the total number of 1012 ‎for the entire wheel this leaves 730 and also splits the ‎wheel into two sections. 730 /2 = 365 days. Those of you who read my last blog may realize that עזרה “The Court” of the Temple of Solomon has a value of 282, and עזרה “The Court” 282 minus the היכל “Heichal” 65 = 217, so we can see a correspondence between the Palaces and the Temple appearing here, and to go a little further in their direction we might draw your attention to these calculations;

Y 309 + H 217 + H 15 = 541.
So YHH 541 – V 471 (the circumference) = 70,
similar to the way the Temple 147 minus the Hall 77 is 70,
and of course 217 / 70 = 3.1.

With the wheel of the Chariot we find the number 31 for אל as the basis for everything, but the Holy Name stands for literally everything in the Heavens and the Earth; it is God and all creation unified in four interlocking parts of the cosmos.

The 3 gates which make up the top triangle of the wheel have a sum total of 31;
11 + 11 + 9 = 31.
And when we add together ALL of the gates of the wheel for all the letters of the paths we find the sum is 3108 which is 777 * 4.

So where are we going with this? Well the ancients must have been astonished to learn that this beautiful arrangement of numbers on the wheel bears a relationship with (יהוה אלהים (112 because 1012 / 4 = 253 and 253 + 112 = 365 (days in a year). Not only that but the number 253 is on the wheel. Collect the letters from all four paths and palaces connecting to the Palace of the Aleph on the right hand side of the wheel:

‎ 1 Palace of the Aleph‎
‎ 9 Path of Teth + 1 the other Aleph = 10‎
‎ 6 The Vav + 2 the Palace of Beth = 8‎
‎ 20 The Kaph + 4 the Palace of Daleth = 24‎
‎ 10 The Yod + 200 the Palace of Resh = 210‎
‎ 1 + 10 + 8 + 24 + 210 = 253.‎

And this was surely noticed by Ezekiel:

Ezekiel 1:10: ֩אל־הימין֩ אריה֩ ופני֩ אדם֩ פני֩ פניהם֩ ודמות לארבעתן֩ופני־נשר֩לארבעתן֩מהשמאול֩ופני־שור֩ לארבעתם ―And the likeness of their faces, the face of a man and the face of a lion on the right side [of the word] to them four and had the face of an ox to the left [of the word] to them four and had the face of an eagle to them four.

Gates of the Seven Palaces

Man = אדם = 45 = the gate of Mem.‎
Lion = ‎אַרְיֵ֤ה‎ = 216 on the right side of the word = ‎אַרְיֵ֤‎ = 211 (gate of the ‎path of Yod).‎
Ox = ‎שׁ֥וֹר‎ = 209 on the left side of the word = ‎וֹר‎ = 206 (gate of the path ‎with four letters; ‎(‎שתצק)‎ Shin, Tav, Tsade & Qoph).
Eagle = ‎נֶ֖שֶׁר‎ = 253.

Therefore:

Man = Path of Mem
Lion = Path of Yod
Ox = Fourfold (‎שתצק‎) Paths
Eagle = Palace of Aleph

Mem (40) Yod (10) Shin (3) Tav (4) Tsade (90) Qoph (100) Aleph (1) = 248
which is numerically identical with the value of Abraham (248) and is 31 x 8. It is as Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish once said: “The patriarchs they ‎themselves were the Divine Chariot!“

The Wheel of the Chariot occupied a time in ancient history where monotheism was just emerging, and as a stepping stone from paganism to pure monotheism was the idea of YHVH as a unifying umbrella. Therefore, though we haven’t discussed it in any detail yet, there are quite a few pagan remnants left on the wheel and if we look closely we can see the names of Asherah, Elat and Hadad spelled out there, under the domain of YHVH in every quarter.

Yhvh (26) + AShRH (209) + 777 = YHVH (1012).
Yhvh + AShRH = 26 + 209 = 235. [235 is the exact number of synodic months in 19 solar years (according to the metonic calendar.]
235 + 777 = 1012 (YHVH).

Elohim is the plural form of El and it is usually thought to refer to the supreme God but on at least one occasion in the Tanakh it is also used to refer to ‘the dead’ (1 Samuel 28:13). It has meanings ranging from “gods” in a general sense to specific gods, or (most frequently) to YHVH but also to demons, angels, kings and prophets. However, while the word has an obvious pantheistic heritage – the associated polytheism was slowly dropped in Judaism and the narrative relationships between the El and his family were either ignored or recast into the domain of the family completely by Greco-Christian cults. It came to mean simply ‘God’ – whatever the original writers of the Torah may have originally intended by its use.

In the Levantine pantheon, El fathered the Gods Hadad, Yam and Mot and their sister the Goddess Anat. El was married to the Goddess Asherah/Elat and in that pantheon the sons of El are called the Elohim. Hadad was the god of rain, storms and fertility; Mot was the God of Death; and Yam was the God of the sea while Anat was Queen of Heaven and a violent War Goddess. In the Baal cycle, Hadad complains to Asherah that he doesn‘t have a Palace of his own like other Gods and has to live in the same dwelling as her and El. Eventually El reluctantly allows Hadad his own house. The ideographic representation of this is found on the Chariot Wheel by the bottom 3 palaces that spell out the name: הדד, and this gives us a clue to the great age and antiquity of the Chariot Wheel because Ugarit was destroyed in 1050 BCE.